empirical study of a three-group classification model using case-based reasoning

Reliability is becoming a very important and competitive factor for software-based products. Software metrics-based quality estimation models provide a systematic and scientific approach to detect software faults early in the life cycle, improving software reliability. Classification models for software quality estimation usually classify observations into two groups. This thesis presents an empirical study of an algorithm for software quality classification using three groups: Three-Group Classification Model using Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). The basic idea behind the algorithm is that it uses the commonly used two-group classification technique three times. It can also be implemented with other quality estimation methods, such as Logistic Regression, Regression Trees, etc. This work evaluates the obtained quality with that from the Discriminant Analysis method. Empirical studies were conducted using an inspection data set, collected from a telecommunications system. It was observed that CBR performs better than Discriminant Analysis.