The opisthobranch order Cephalaspidea is well-recognized as an unnatural, paraphyletic
group characterized by «evolutionary trends» toward reduction and loss of many features. A
survey of 35 key classifications and published phylograms involving cephalaspids revealed a
general lack of morphological definition for the order and the tenacious use of traditional characters.
Of 49 frequently-used characters, 44 (90%) are problematic for use in modern phylogenetic (cladistic) analyses due to reductive nature, non-homology, incompleteness, or other
grounds. Claims of «rampant parallelism» involving a majority of these characters are based on a
priori decisions and are therefore presently unjustified. The few consistent family groups in
published phylograms are most strongly supported by characters correlated with diet, and may
therefore also be open to question. Successful resolution of the phylogeny of these and other
<<lower heterobranchs» will require critical reevaluation of cephalaspid morphology to determine
an improved set of taxonomically informative, homologous characters. New areas of investigation
are proposed.
Member of
Contributors
Publisher
Societa Italiana di Malacologia
Date Issued
1993
Note
Language
Type
Genre
Form
Extent
22 p.
Subject (Topical)
Identifier
FA00007259
Additional Information
The opisthobranch order Cephalaspidea is well-recognized as an unnatural, paraphyletic
group characterized by «evolutionary trends» toward reduction and loss of many features. A
survey of 35 key classifications and published phylograms involving cephalaspids revealed a
general lack of morphological definition for the order and the tenacious use of traditional characters.
Of 49 frequently-used characters, 44 (90%) are problematic for use in modern phylogenetic (cladistic) analyses due to reductive nature, non-homology, incompleteness, or other
grounds. Claims of «rampant parallelism» involving a majority of these characters are based on a
priori decisions and are therefore presently unjustified. The few consistent family groups in
published phylograms are most strongly supported by characters correlated with diet, and may
therefore also be open to question. Successful resolution of the phylogeny of these and other
<<lower heterobranchs» will require critical reevaluation of cephalaspid morphology to determine
an improved set of taxonomically informative, homologous characters. New areas of investigation
are proposed.
group characterized by «evolutionary trends» toward reduction and loss of many features. A
survey of 35 key classifications and published phylograms involving cephalaspids revealed a
general lack of morphological definition for the order and the tenacious use of traditional characters.
Of 49 frequently-used characters, 44 (90%) are problematic for use in modern phylogenetic (cladistic) analyses due to reductive nature, non-homology, incompleteness, or other
grounds. Claims of «rampant parallelism» involving a majority of these characters are based on a
priori decisions and are therefore presently unjustified. The few consistent family groups in
published phylograms are most strongly supported by characters correlated with diet, and may
therefore also be open to question. Successful resolution of the phylogeny of these and other
<<lower heterobranchs» will require critical reevaluation of cephalaspid morphology to determine
an improved set of taxonomically informative, homologous characters. New areas of investigation
are proposed.
Florida Atlantic University. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute contribution 999
This manuscript is an author version with the final
publication available and may be cited as: Mikkelsen, P. M. (1993). Monophyly versus the
Cephalaspidea (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) with an analysis of traditional Cephalaspid characters.
Bollettino Malacologico, 29(5-8), 115-138.
publication available and may be cited as: Mikkelsen, P. M. (1993). Monophyly versus the
Cephalaspidea (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) with an analysis of traditional Cephalaspid characters.
Bollettino Malacologico, 29(5-8), 115-138.
Date Backup
1993
Date Text
1993
Date Issued (EDTF)
1993
Extension
FAU
IID
FA00007259
Organizations
Attributed name: Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute
Person Preferred Name
Mikkelsen, Paula M.
Physical Description
22 p.
Title Plain
Monophyly versus theCephalaspidea (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) with an analysis of traditional Cephalaspid characters
Origin Information
1993
Societa Italiana di Malacologia
Milan, Italy
Place
Milan, Italy
Title
Monophyly versus theCephalaspidea (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) with an analysis of traditional Cephalaspid characters
Other Title Info
Monophyly versus theCephalaspidea (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) with an analysis of traditional Cephalaspid characters