RECRUITMENT, PROGRAMS AND RETENTION OF DISADVANTAGED YOUTH IN FLORIDA COMMUNITY-JUNIOR COLLEGES

The purpose of this study was to determine effectiveness of the recruitment
methods, programs available, and retention methods and procedures
used for the disadvantaged youth in Florida Public Community Junior
Colleges.
In order to identify and compare evidence related to this purpose
a survey questionnaire was sent to the counseling department in each college.
The questionnaire was constructed to obtain data from these areas:
(1) methods of recruitment, (2) identification of ethnic and economic
categories included in disadvantagement, (3) methods of selection of students,
(4) material aid given by college to disadvantaged students, (4)
extent and effectiveness of vocational and occupational programs, (6) the
present status of student retention, and (7) follow up programs on dropouts.
The questionnaire was sent to five Florida Community Junior Colleges
for their reaction and response. Three of the five respondents
mentioned an imbalance in emphasis between recruitment and programs and
between programs and retention. After consultation with an advisor,
several more questions on programs were added to correct imbalance and
add other pertinent information to the study.
The questionnaire was sent to the 28 Florida Community Colleges
and seven of their satellite campuses. Community Junior Colleges surveyed
were identified by the 1971-72 edition of the American Association
of Community Junior College's Directory. Of the 23 out of 35 questionnaires
which were filled out by the community junior colleges, 18 were
reported by major campuses and 5 were from satellite campuses, representing
64.3% of the total surveyed. Every questionnaire that was returned
was utilized in the statistical analysis, and is reflected in the above
percentage of those surveyed.
Chapter II shows an analysis of data for the entire study and a
preliminary discussion of recruitment and retention. The statistical
treatment of the findings for recruitment and retention is given in
detail.
Chapter III reflects a preliminary discussion of programs, and the
analysis of results of the programs now in operation for disadvantaged
students.
Chapter IV records final findings and implications.
Major Conclusions and Implications: The Florida community colleges in fact have both diverse offerings
and student populations. Documentation of the commitment to serve in
general is more evident than research to determine specific opportunity
for the disadvantaged. Special training programs are geared to the
academic offering of the college with conservative emphasis on remediation.
There seems to be an unwillingness to admit a need for institutional
change, especially as programs relate to retention.