Sieving precision: sonic sifter versusRo-Tap

File
Contributors
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology.
Date Issued
1978
Note

The Sonic Sifter and the Ro-Tap are compared as sediment particle sieve size analysis
instruments. Various operational advantages and disadvantages inherent to each technique are considered.
The Sonic Sifter is more portable, quieter and more versatile, whereas the Ro-Tap is more durable,
more economical and precise. These observations supplemented by comparative statistical treatments
indicate that the Ro-Tap is the more reliable and reproducible method for sediment sieve size analysis.

Language
Type
Genre
Form
Extent
5 p.
Identifier
FA00007129
Additional Information
The Sonic Sifter and the Ro-Tap are compared as sediment particle sieve size analysis
instruments. Various operational advantages and disadvantages inherent to each technique are considered.
The Sonic Sifter is more portable, quieter and more versatile, whereas the Ro-Tap is more durable,
more economical and precise. These observations supplemented by comparative statistical treatments
indicate that the Ro-Tap is the more reliable and reproducible method for sediment sieve size analysis.
Florida Atlantic University. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute contribution 70
This manuscript is an author version with the final
publication available and may be cited as: Wolcott, R. T. (1978). Sieving precision: sonic sifter versus
Ro-Tap. Journal of Sedimentary Research 48(2), 661-664.
Date Backup
1978
Date Text
1978
Date Issued (EDTF)
1978
Extension


FAU

IID
FA00007129
Organizations
Person Preferred Name

Wolcott, R. Timothy
Physical Description

pdf
5 p.
Title Plain
Sieving precision: sonic sifter versusRo-Tap
Origin Information

1978
Society for Sedimentary Geology.

Tulsa, OK

Place

Tulsa, OK
Title
Sieving precision: sonic sifter versusRo-Tap
Other Title Info

Sieving precision: sonic sifter versusRo-Tap