Note
Includes bibliography.
Member of
Contributors
Publisher
Florida Atlantic University
Date Issued
2016
EDTF Date Created
2016
Description
Popular children are visible and influential in an adolescent peer group
(LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002). Previous studies have demonstrated that there are two
types of popular children: aggressive-popular and prosocial-popular (Cillessen & Rose,
2005). The current study was designed to determine that, while both types are well liked
and accepted, they draw favor from different sources of affiliation. The Study uses a
sample of 450 adolescents (36.2% boys and 63.1% girls) from one high school in
Lithuania. Hierarchical generalized logistic linear models (HGLLM) were conducted to
determine if there was differential acceptance of aggressive-popular and prosocialpopular
adolescents. Also, models determined if peers exhausted with school, attached to
school, connected to peers and anxious/withdrawn would have differential association
with aggressive-popular and prosocial-popular adolescents.
Results answered 3 questions. First, HGLLM models were used to replicate the
previous finding that popular adolescents have more affiliations than other peers. Second, results determined that popular, popular-aggressive, and popular-prosocial adolescents
were all more likely to receive affiliation nominations from peers. Third, results
determined that aggressive-popular adolescents were chosen as affiliates by peers
exhausted with school, and less likely to be chosen by peers attached to school, connected
to friends and withdrawn. Prosocial-popular adolescents were chose as affiliates by peers
attached to school and connected with friends. These findings indicate that aggressivepopular
adolescents draw favor from crowds that are more oriented toward youth culture,
while prosocial-popular draw favor from crowds that are more oriented toward adult
culture (Brown, 1990)
The findings first extend previous research by demonstrating that popular
adolescents, of all types, are likely to receive affiliation nominations. Furthermore,
prosocial-popular and aggressive-popular adolescents have more acceptance and
affiliations than others, but this attraction comes from different sources. Previous studies
have shown that popular children are well liked by some but not by others (Parkhurst &
Hopmeyer, 1998). Taken with findings demonstrating that popular children strategically
use cooperation or manipulation to influence others (Cillessen & Rose, 2005), the current
study extends knowledge about the peer groups where cooperation or manipulation
strategies may be most effective. Crowds that are school oriented and have positive peer
relations follow prosocial-popular peers while crowds that are fed up with school follow
aggressive-popular peers.
(LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002). Previous studies have demonstrated that there are two
types of popular children: aggressive-popular and prosocial-popular (Cillessen & Rose,
2005). The current study was designed to determine that, while both types are well liked
and accepted, they draw favor from different sources of affiliation. The Study uses a
sample of 450 adolescents (36.2% boys and 63.1% girls) from one high school in
Lithuania. Hierarchical generalized logistic linear models (HGLLM) were conducted to
determine if there was differential acceptance of aggressive-popular and prosocialpopular
adolescents. Also, models determined if peers exhausted with school, attached to
school, connected to peers and anxious/withdrawn would have differential association
with aggressive-popular and prosocial-popular adolescents.
Results answered 3 questions. First, HGLLM models were used to replicate the
previous finding that popular adolescents have more affiliations than other peers. Second, results determined that popular, popular-aggressive, and popular-prosocial adolescents
were all more likely to receive affiliation nominations from peers. Third, results
determined that aggressive-popular adolescents were chosen as affiliates by peers
exhausted with school, and less likely to be chosen by peers attached to school, connected
to friends and withdrawn. Prosocial-popular adolescents were chose as affiliates by peers
attached to school and connected with friends. These findings indicate that aggressivepopular
adolescents draw favor from crowds that are more oriented toward youth culture,
while prosocial-popular draw favor from crowds that are more oriented toward adult
culture (Brown, 1990)
The findings first extend previous research by demonstrating that popular
adolescents, of all types, are likely to receive affiliation nominations. Furthermore,
prosocial-popular and aggressive-popular adolescents have more acceptance and
affiliations than others, but this attraction comes from different sources. Previous studies
have shown that popular children are well liked by some but not by others (Parkhurst &
Hopmeyer, 1998). Taken with findings demonstrating that popular children strategically
use cooperation or manipulation to influence others (Cillessen & Rose, 2005), the current
study extends knowledge about the peer groups where cooperation or manipulation
strategies may be most effective. Crowds that are school oriented and have positive peer
relations follow prosocial-popular peers while crowds that are fed up with school follow
aggressive-popular peers.
Language
Type
Form
Extent
84 p.
Subject (Topical)
Identifier
FA00004604
Additional Information
Includes bibliography.
Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2016.
FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
Date Backup
2016
Date Created Backup
2016
Date Text
2016
Date Created (EDTF)
2016
Date Issued (EDTF)
2016
Extension
FAU
IID
FA00004604
Organizations
Attributed name: Florida Atlantic University
Attributed name: Charles E. Schmidt College of Science
Attributed name: Department of Psychology
Person Preferred Name
Hiatt, Cody
author
Graduate College
Physical Description
application/pdf
84 p.
Title Plain
Sources of Popularity: Aggressive and Prosocial Strategists and the Adolescents Who Affiliate With Them.
Use and Reproduction
Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Origin Information
2016
2016
Florida Atlantic University
Boca Raton, Fla.
Physical Location
Florida Atlantic University Libraries
Place
Boca Raton, Fla.
Sub Location
Digital Library
Title
Sources of Popularity: Aggressive and Prosocial Strategists and the Adolescents Who Affiliate With Them.
Other Title Info
Sources of Popularity: Aggressive and Prosocial Strategists and the Adolescents Who Affiliate With Them.