empirical study of analogy-based software quality classification models

Time and cost are among the most important elements in a software project. By efficiently using time and resources we can reduce costs. Any program can potentially contain faults. If we can identify those program modules that have better quality and are less likely to be fault-prone, then we can reduce the effort and cost required in testing these modules. This thesis presents a series of studies evaluating the use of Case-Based Reasoning (CBR ) as an effective method for classifying program modules based upon their quality. We believe that this is the first time that the mahalanobis distance, a distance measure utilizing the covariance matrix of the independent variables which accounts for the multi-colinearity of the data without the necessity for preprocessing, and data clustering, wherein the data was separated into groups based on a dependent variable have been used as modeling techniques in conjunction with (CBR).