Empirical methods of beam angle optimization (BAO) are tested against the BAO
that is currently employed in Eclipse treatment planning software. Creating an improved
BAO can decrease the amount of time a dosimetrist spends on making a treatment plan,
improve the treatment quality and enhance the tools an inexperienced dosimetrist can use
to develop planning techniques. Using empirical data created by experienced dosimetrists
from 69 patients treated for lung cancer, the most frequently used gantry angles were
applied to four different regions in each lung to gather an optimal set of fields that could
be used to treat future lung cancer patients. This method, given the moniker FAU BAO,
is compared in 7 plans created with the Eclipse BAO choosing 5 fields and 9 fields. The
results show that the conformality index improved by 30% or 3% when using the 5 and 9
fields. The conformation number was better by 12% from the 5 fields and 9% from the 9
fields. The organs at risk (OAR) were overall more protected to produce fewer
nonstochastic effects from the radiation treatment with the FAU BAO.