Soft rubber tumbling barrels, some with screen windows, were used to simulate natural abrasionof coral branches. Tumbled for equal times, sealed barrrels produced more sediment from coral branchesthan barrels with windows, and dead coral produced more sediment than live coral. Tumbled dead coralproduced a gravel mode (2-4 mm) of fragmented barnacles and a sand mode (0.2 mm) of coral. Tumbledlive coral produced similar results but lacked barnacles. Time series tests of 1-1000 minutes showed thatclosed barrels produced increasingly greater percentages of carbonate mud and increasingly finer sand grainsizemodes. Tumbling barrels with screen windows yielded particles of unchanging size through the sameintervals. Natural sediment with broken coral branches contained coral sand most abundantly between0.125-0.250 mm, which is the same as produced by tumbling dead coral in barrels with screen windows.Strong grain-size modes at 0.2 mm produced by sonification and tumbling of live and dead coral in sealed and screen-window barrels support the Sorby Principle of skeletal breakdown.
Member of
Contributors
Publisher
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists
Date Issued
1983
Note
Language
Type
Genre
Form
Extent
9 p.
Subject (Topical)
Identifier
FA00007144
Additional Information
Soft rubber tumbling barrels, some with screen windows, were used to simulate natural abrasionof coral branches. Tumbled for equal times, sealed barrrels produced more sediment from coral branchesthan barrels with windows, and dead coral produced more sediment than live coral. Tumbled dead coralproduced a gravel mode (2-4 mm) of fragmented barnacles and a sand mode (0.2 mm) of coral. Tumbledlive coral produced similar results but lacked barnacles. Time series tests of 1-1000 minutes showed thatclosed barrels produced increasingly greater percentages of carbonate mud and increasingly finer sand grainsizemodes. Tumbling barrels with screen windows yielded particles of unchanging size through the sameintervals. Natural sediment with broken coral branches contained coral sand most abundantly between0.125-0.250 mm, which is the same as produced by tumbling dead coral in barrels with screen windows.Strong grain-size modes at 0.2 mm produced by sonification and tumbling of live and dead coral in sealed and screen-window barrels support the Sorby Principle of skeletal breakdown.
Florida Atlantic University. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute contribution 323
This manuscript is an author
version with the final publication available and may be cited as: Hoskin, C. M., Geier, J. C., & Reed, J.
K. (1983). Sediment produced from abrasion of the branching stony coral Oculina Varicosa. Journal of
Sedimentary Petrology, 53(3), 779-786.
version with the final publication available and may be cited as: Hoskin, C. M., Geier, J. C., & Reed, J.
K. (1983). Sediment produced from abrasion of the branching stony coral Oculina Varicosa. Journal of
Sedimentary Petrology, 53(3), 779-786.
Date Backup
1983
Date Text
1983
DOI
10.1306/212F82BA-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D
Date Issued (EDTF)
1983
Extension
FAU
IID
FA00007144
Person Preferred Name
Hoskin, Charles M.
Physical Description
9 p.
Title Plain
Sediment produced from abrasion of the branching stony coral Oculina Varicosa
Origin Information
1983
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists
Tulsa, OK
Place
Tulsa, OK
Title
Sediment produced from abrasion of the branching stony coral Oculina Varicosa
Other Title Info
Sediment produced from abrasion of the branching stony coral Oculina Varicosa