Distribution and ecology of estuarine ectoprocts: A critical review

File
Contributors
Publisher
Springer
Date Issued
1977
Note

While most gymnolaemates are restricted to waters of normal salinity, at least 3–6% are able to penetrate some distance into mixohaline water. Of this group, which includes 9 species of cyclostomes, 35 species of ctenostomes, 55 species of anascan and 21 species of ascophoran cheilostomes, the cyclostomes and the ascophorans are least tolerant of diluted salinities, the ctenostomes and the anascans are most tolerant.

Language
Type
Genre
Extent
25 p.
Identifier
3333067
Additional Information
While most gymnolaemates are restricted to waters of normal salinity, at least 3–6% are able to penetrate some distance into mixohaline water. Of this group, which includes 9 species of cyclostomes, 35 species of ctenostomes, 55 species of anascan and 21 species of ascophoran cheilostomes, the cyclostomes and the ascophorans are least tolerant of diluted salinities, the ctenostomes and the anascans are most tolerant.
This manuscript is an author version with the final publication available at http://www.springerlink.com and may be cited as: Winston, J. E. (1977). Distribution and ecology of estuarine ectoprocts: A critical review. Chesapeake Science, 18(1), 34-57. doi:10.2307/1350363
Florida Atlantic University. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute contribution #53.
Date Backup
1977
Date Text
1977
DOI
10.2307/1350363
Date Issued (EDTF)
1977
Extension


FAU
FAU
admin_unit="FAU01", ingest_id="ing12122", creator="creator:BCHANG", creation_date="2012-02-27 16:32:52", modified_by="super:FAUDIG", modification_date="2014-02-13 11:08:01"

IID
FADT3333067
Issuance
single unit
Organizations
Person Preferred Name

Winston, Judith E.

creator

Physical Description

pdf
25 p.
Title Plain
Distribution and ecology of estuarine ectoprocts: A critical review
Origin Information

Springer
1977
single unit
Title
Distribution and ecology of estuarine ectoprocts: A critical review
Other Title Info

Distribution and ecology of estuarine ectoprocts: A critical review