In this thesis the literature of disequilibrium macroeconomic theory
was reviewed and the empirical relevance of the Keynesian interpretation
of the labor demand function was examined and contrasted to the
disequilibrium interpretation of Barro and Grossman, Patinkin's
disequilibrium theory of the labor market and Clower's partial
disequilibrium analysis of the commodity market were examined in depth.
The bulk of the literature review was devoted to the general disequilibrium
model of income and employment determination developed by Barro and
Grossman. Barra and Grossman's criticism of Keynes for predicting a
negatively sloped labor demand function was analyzed using regression
analysis to estimate the function. Barro and Grossman's criticism
was found to be based on insufficient evidence, and evidence presented
in this thesis supported the Keynesian position.