Note
Includes bibliography.
Member of
Contributors
Publisher
Florida Atlantic University
Date Issued
2015
EDTF Date Created
2015
Description
I empirically investigate the managements’ decision to voluntarily disclose strategic information. While carrying a benefit of reduced information asymmetry, strategic information disclosure carries a cost of investors disagreeing with managements’ strategy and thus refusing to provide funding to the firm. Using a hand- collected sample of information releases, I identify firm characteristics that affect the likelihood of strategic information disclosure.
Language
Type
Form
Extent
189 p.
Subject (Topical)
Identifier
FA00004473
Additional Information
Includes bibliography.
Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2015
FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
Date Backup
2015
Date Created Backup
2015
Date Text
2015
Date Created (EDTF)
2015
Date Issued (EDTF)
2015
Extension
FAU
IID
FA00004473
Organizations
Attributed name: Florida Atlantic University
Attributed name: College of Business
Attributed name: Department of Finance
Person Preferred Name
Volkov, Nikanor
author
Graduate College
Physical Description
application/pdf
189 p.
Title Plain
Strategic information disclosure when there is fundamental disagreement: an empirical investigation
Use and Reproduction
Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Origin Information
2015
2015
Florida Atlantic University
Boca Raton, Fla.
Physical Location
Florida Atlantic University Libraries
Place
Boca Raton, Fla.
Sub Location
Digital Library
Title
Strategic information disclosure when there is fundamental disagreement: an empirical investigation
Other Title Info
Strategic information disclosure when there is fundamental disagreement: an empirical investigation