EVALUATION OF THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION TOOLS IN MICROSIMULATION ENVIRONMENT

Traffic simulation and signal timing optimization are classified in structure into two main categories: (i) Macroscopic or Microscopic; (ii) Deterministic or Stochastic. Performance of the optimized signal timing derived by any tool is influenced by the methodology used in how calculations are executed in a particular tool. In this study, the performance of the optimal signal timing plans developed by two of the most popular traffic analysis tools, HCS and Tru-Traffic, each of them has its inbuilt objective function(s) to optimize signal timing for intersection, is compared with an ideal and an existing timing plans (base case) for the area of study using the microsimulation software VISSIM. An urban arterial with 29 intersections and high traffic in Fort Lauderdale, Florida serves as the test bed. To eliminate unfair superiority in the results, all experiments were performed under identical geometry and traffic conditions in each tool. Comparison of the optimized plans is conducted on the basis of average delay, average stopped delay, average number of stops, number of vehicles completed trips, latent delay, and latent demand from the simulated vehicle network performance evaluation results in VISSIM. The results indicate that, overall, HCS with its overall delay objective and the Tru-Traffic programs produce signal timing with comparable quality that performed similar to the un-optimized base case for most of the performance measures.