Model
Digital Document
Publisher
Florida Atlantic University
Description
This study focused on the temporalis configuration in Middle Pleistocene
hominins and how that configuration is correlated with various structures in the
craniofacial complex. Three hypotheses were tested using univariate comparisons,
regression, and scaling analyses. Results showed that Middle Pleistocene hominins
have small anterior temporalis muscles relative to the size oftheir faces, contrary to
expectation. This discrepancy may be explained by a decrease in the size of the
temporal fossa as a consequence of postorbital constriction concurrent with
encephalization. Additionally, this configuration may have implications for the
biomechanics of chewing, rendering the masticatory structures of Middle Pleistocene
hominins less efficient than in other hominins. Future studies in this area should
analyze the size of the temporal fossa in conjunction with rates of encephalization,
using cranial capacity as a measure of vault size. Such analyses, coupled with
comparisons of temporalis muscle size, will better explain the relationships suggested
here.
hominins and how that configuration is correlated with various structures in the
craniofacial complex. Three hypotheses were tested using univariate comparisons,
regression, and scaling analyses. Results showed that Middle Pleistocene hominins
have small anterior temporalis muscles relative to the size oftheir faces, contrary to
expectation. This discrepancy may be explained by a decrease in the size of the
temporal fossa as a consequence of postorbital constriction concurrent with
encephalization. Additionally, this configuration may have implications for the
biomechanics of chewing, rendering the masticatory structures of Middle Pleistocene
hominins less efficient than in other hominins. Future studies in this area should
analyze the size of the temporal fossa in conjunction with rates of encephalization,
using cranial capacity as a measure of vault size. Such analyses, coupled with
comparisons of temporalis muscle size, will better explain the relationships suggested
here.
Member of