United States --Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Model
Digital Document
Publisher
Florida Atlantic University
Description
Takeovers of privately-held targets have outnumbered takeovers of publiclytraded
targets over the years. This dissertation focuses on takeover activities of privatelyheld
targets and examines several important issues which have never been touched on in
the literature. The first essay examines the factors that determine the choice between a
privately-held target and a publicly-traded target. After the size of the target and the
prevalence of private firms in each industry in each year are controlled for, I find that the
stock bidder tends to target a privately-held firm and the cash bidder tends to target a
publicly-traded firm when pursuing a high-tech target. When acquiring a firm in the same
industry and being inexperienced in takeover activities, the bidder is more likely to target
a publicly-traded firm as opposed to a privately-held firm. The passage of the SarbanesOxley
Act (SOX) also has an affect on the choice of a privately-held target or a publiclytraded
target; everything else being equal, the cash bidder is more likely choose to
acquire a private firm while the stock bidder is less likely to choose a private firm upon
the introduction of SOX. The second essay examines the factors that influence the choice
of stock versus cash payment in takeovers of privately-held targets. Stock is found to be more frequently used among takeovers in which the bidding firm has more debt and less
free cash flow prior to the deal , the target is a high-tech firm, and the target management
is retained in the combined entity. In addition, since the adoption of SOX, cash has been
used more frequently and to greater extent among the sample of takeovers of privatelyheld
targets. The third essay examines the effects of restrictions on resale of stock issued
in takeovers on the bidder's wealth effect and long-run stock price performance. I find
that restrictions on resale of stock are more popular among takeovers of privately-held
targets as compared to takeovers of publicly-traded targets. Restrictions on resale are
found to be positively related to the bidder's announcement abnormal return and
negatively related to the bidder's long-run stock price performance.