Carcharhinus limbatus

Many marine species distributions have shifted poleward in response to global climate change. Many environmental characteristics will be affected by climate change including temperature and phytoplankton concentration; yet, photoperiod will remain the same. It is imperative to gather baseline distribution data on migratory species so that these shifts can be measured and mitigated. Sex-specific differences in reproductive strategies cause sexual segregation, sex-specific differences in spatial distribution. Female blacktip sharks exhibit a synchronous, biennial reproductive cycle in which one year of reproduction is followed by a resting year. Acoustic telemetry can be used in conjunction with collaborative networks to track migratory species over great distances. However, the irregular spacing of acoustic receivers often results in sporadic detection data, which can lead to skewed distribution information. This project developed and tested an analysis process to regularize sporadic acoustic detection data. Those regularized data were then applied to cluster analyses to determine the seasonal spatial distributions of blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, off the United States East Coast and corresponding environmental correlates of latitudinal movement. Sexes of this population were investigated separately and in combination. Differences in distribution were evaluated between sexes, and within females, between reproductive states. These data showed that the U.S. East Coast blacktip shark population distributes from Palm Beach County, FL to Long Island, NY and exhibits sexual segregation, in which females display a more truncated migratory pattern than males.

Sharks respond to low frequency pulsed sounds but are documented to lack the capacity to detect these sounds beyond the acoustic near field. The purpose of my study was to quantify the distance blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) oriented to sound stimuli, and determine if responses occurred in the far field. Using an aerial drone and underwater speaker, C. limbatus were filmed responding to sound stimuli (100 – 200 Hz; 200 – 400 Hz; and 400 – 800 Hz). Upon detection, C. limbatus elicited a 20 – 160° turn from the speaker, and rapidly swam away. Sharks responded to all frequencies from at least 62 m, and 71.6% of all responses (n = 209) occurred in the far field. This indicates that blacktip sharks can detect and orient away from a sound stimulus at distances that extend beyond the acoustic near field, which suggests that they are not detecting sound using the inner ear otoconia.