School of Accounting

I investigate the link between real earnings management and customer satisfaction. Following the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires public companies to ensure the accuracy of their financial reporting, the use of non-accrual based methods to achieve financial earnings targets has become commonplace. Nonaccrual-based methods consist of decisions that curtail firm activities, which increase net income; however, these methods come at the cost of future operations. These opportunistic behaviors in the service, retail, and hospitality industries impact customers and a firm's long-term value. I hypothesize that the outcome will be lower customer satisfaction and service quality.
I use firms’ publicly available financial information to detect real earning management (REM) of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses to understand how firms operate. Physical changes to a firm’s operating environment through these financial actions are immediately observable, generating negative electronic word of mouth. I use text analysis software to determine if the comment is positive or negative and the strength of the customers' sentiment, allowing me to observe the harmful effects of reducing SG&A expenses through the lens of the customer. In addition, I use American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) scores to provide an overall assessment. I regress my customer satisfaction and service quality measures on the REM measure to test the hypotheses on the impact of REM. Further, I analyze and establish the link between REM's impact on the firm's sales growth rates.

I examine the relationship between environmental regulation stringency and the extent of voluntary environmental disclosures by firms. The study draws on theoretical frameworks including legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory, and information asymmetry, to explore how different mechanisms influence firm behavior in the context of environmental transparency.
My empirical analysis shows a positive relationship between the stringency of environmental regulations and the level of voluntary environmental disclosures. This relationship is weakened by factors such as board independence and institutional ownership. I further confirm the positive effect of national level of environmental regulation stringency on the environmental voluntary disclosure. However, I fail to find supporting evidence on the positive moderating role of national level of environmental regulation stringency and corporate governance. In contrast, I find evidence that external institutional ownership and independent directors, who represent interests of external blockholders, have a preventive and monitoring effect on the main relationship to reduce the threat of misleading voluntary information and proprietary cost.

This study examines whether emerging growth company (EGC) investors respond to the annual required internal control disclosures over financial reporting (ICFR). I develop three hypotheses to test across the EGC lifecycle. Specifically, I investigate whether the first year ICFR disclosure, the remediation of a previously reported material weakness ICFR disclosure and the EGC exit are associated with the firm’s cumulative abnormal return over a three-day event window. Prior literature has observed that ICFR disclosures by management and the ICFR audit opinion can be shown to be informative to investors. However, I am not aware of any study investigating whether the EGC investors respond to this type of information. I find that the reported ICFR disclosures are not associated with cumulative abnormal returns during their initial ICFR report disclosure or upon exit as informative but do respond to the reporting of material weakness remediation.

I examine the importance of corporate scientific research. It is crucial to understand the role of corporate scientific research because such a knowledge could form an appropriate response to the current decline of corporate scientific research amidst the evolving innovation ecosystem featured with growing university research and tech companies’ research. R&D is often treated as a single construct in accounting and finance research for firm innovation. However, corporate scientific research (“R”) has different implications for firm innovations, “R” creates new knowledge, and reduced investment in "R" may lead to a loss of internal research capability, disrupting the speed and quality of innovation. As such, it is necessary and meaningful to examine "R" separately from "R&D."
Historically, corporate scientific research has played an important role in driving breakthrough innovations. Beginning in the 1980s, there has been a decline in corporate scientific research in favor of university research and tech companies’ research. Consequently, this raises a question: if corporate scientific research was important, is it still important? This is a fundamental question because if corporate scientific research is still important, declining or even stagnant corporate scientific research would present an issue of concern for firms and the economy.

Prior studies examine either CEO, CFO, or audit committee member gender as a determinant of audit quality. In contrast, this study makes the unique contribution of examining the interactive effects between a gender diverse CEO-CFO dyad and a gender diverse audit committee on audit quality. Further, prior studies examine the attribute of gender as a determinant of audit quality in isolation. I examine the effect of gender on audit quality in tandem with the potentially moderating effect of managerial overconfidence. In doing so, this study makes the unique contribution of examining whether the socialized construct of gender, or the cognitive bias of overconfidence, will weigh more heavily on decisions that relate to audit quality. Results supplement social role and role congruity theories which suggest female leaders are socialized to adopt a management style resulting in more transparent financial reporting and higher audit quality. Specifically, I find incrementally higher audit quality associated with a gender diverse CEO-CFO dyad and audit committee. Further, I find firms with overconfident female CFOs are associated with higher audit quality than firms with overconfident male CFOs. This implies the pressure to maintain the socialized gender role appears to constrain the female manager’s overconfident tendencies. Finally, in a subsample of overconfident CFOs, I find gender diverse audit committees temper female more than male overconfidence for effects on audit quality.

There has been a strong push for workplace diversity in the United States (U.S.) in recent years. Work teams consisting of employees with diverse backgrounds can augment firms’ competitive advantage. This view is consistent with the cognitive diversity hypothesis, which depicts multiple perspectives generated by cognitive differences among organizational members resulting in creative problem-solving. In this study, I investigate the role of cognitive diversity, measured by differences in a set of seven cultural traits between the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), in shaping firm financial reporting quality. Relying on the upper-echelon theory that executive characteristics affect firm outcomes and the cognitive diversity hypothesis that diversity reduces groupthink, sparks innovation, increases employee retention rate, and builds a positive firm culture, I expect to find a positive relationship between cognitive diversity and financial reporting quality.
In determining firm performance and outcomes, differences in executive demographic characteristics such as age, tenure, gender, and race may have an impact on how executive cognitive perceptions, values, and information sets, shape their decisions and outcomes. Therefore, I then examine the effect of executive demographic diversity on the link between executive cognitive diversity and financial reporting quality. Diversity has received a lot of attention over the last decades, but it is unclear ex ante how different types of diversity interact with each other in shaping firm outcomes. Therefore, I examine but do not hypothesize the direction of the effect of executive demographic diversity on the link between executive cognitive diversity and financial reporting quality.

Since 2005 corporate managers must discuss their firm’s significant risk factors that may materially and unfavorably affect corporate outcomes in the Item 1A Risk Factor Disclosure (RFD) section of their 10-K filings. However, there is limited research on whether firms change the sentiment of their mandatory disclosures after a significant economic event. I use bankruptcy announcements as a unique setting in this study to assess non-announcing firms’ responses to these events as a bankruptcy announcement generates significant concern to non-announcing industry peer firms. I explore whether industry peers change four measures of sentiment (i.e., length, negative tone, specificity, forward-looking statements) of Item 1A RFDs after a rival firm’s bankruptcy filing. Using textual analysis methodology, I find that industry peer firms have shorter, less negative, and less forward-looking RFDs after another firm’s bankruptcy announcement. These results imply that industry peers are likely to adjust their tone of mandatory filings (i.e., Item 1A RFDs) in response to a rival firm’s bankruptcy announcement. I further provide evidence that firms do not use separate subsections to disclose their firm- and industry-specific risks within their Item 1A RFDs. Lastly, the lengths of financial, litigation, other-idiosyncratic, and other-systematic topic disclosures significantly decrease for non-announcing industry peers while the length of tax relevant risk topic does not significantly change after a bankruptcy filing. This study adds to mandatory research by identifying the spillover effect of a bankruptcy announcement on Item 1A RFDs. This research also contributes to accounting literature by providing evidence that non-announcing industry peers significantly adjust the sentiment of their risk factor information. Market participants including investors, shareholders, and financial analysts can improve investment decision accuracy by analyzing the industry peers’ risk factor information.

Many CEOs are philanthropists and express their passion for social welfare through service to various charities and foundations. However, it is unclear whether these behaviors are driven by intrinsic motivations, such as prosocial value and altruism, or by extrinsic and egoistic motivations like reputation and social network building. To understand the underlying motivations and consequences of these behaviors, I build on the self-determination theory and investigate how CEO charitable inclination, defined as CEO sitting on charity boards, affects corporate tax avoidance. I further examine how CEO charitable inclination impacts firm value through corporate tax policies.
I find that CEO charitable inclination is negatively associated with corporate tax avoidance. Specifically, firms with charitable-inclined CEOs pay higher cash taxes and are less likely to engage in aggressive forms of tax planning, such as tax shelters. The results are robust to different model specifications and alternative measures. Further, I conduct additional analysis examining the underlying motivations of CEO charitable inclination and find it positively associated with intrinsic motivations, such as prosocial values and high moral standards. These results provide strong evidence that charitable-inclined CEOs, driven by their intrinsic motivations, are concerned about social welfare and government revenue. These CEOs are less likely to engage in unethical or immoral behaviors, such as aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. However, I do not find evidence that CEO charitable inclination has a moderating effect on the relationship between corporate tax avoidance and firm value.

The addition of Key Audit Matters (KAM) to standard audit reports is one of the most significant changes to the audit report in decades. However, research on the informativeness of KAMs to investors is mixed. I add to this literature by examining whether variation in how goodwill impairment KAMs (GIKAM) are determined influence their informativeness. I first develop a determinants model to predict when an audit client would receive a GIKAM and find that auditor quality (Big 4) and auditor independence (fee ratio) are negatively associated with the likelihood a client receives a GIKAM. I then use this model to create measures of unexpected GIKAMs to test the relationship between unexpected GIKAMs and market outcomes (price and volume). Using annual report date and three-day cumulative abnormal returns and abnormal trading volume, I find no relationship between unexpected GIKAMs and price or volume reactions. In my third hypothesis, I predict and find that GIKAMs are positively associated with goodwill impairment recognition using pooled and propensity score matched samples. These findings contribute to the growing literature on the usefulness of expanded audit reports as well as audit literature in general.

I examine whether and how racially/ethnically diverse board impacts the quality of reported earnings. Agency theory suggests that the board of directors acts as a robust governance mechanism to reduce opportunistic managerial behavior that may harm shareholders' wealth. Further, diversity coalesces a variety of attributes from different directors that are valuable in predicting organizational outcomes. The majority of extant literature focuses on gender-diverse boards and various firm outcomes, while little is known about how directors' race/ethnicity affects earnings quality.
Using a sample of firms publicly traded in the U.S., I find that increased board racial/ethnic diversity is associated with better earnings quality as proxied by lower discretionary accruals and lower probability of internal control weaknesses and financial statement restatements. I further examine whether firms with increased diversity (racial/ethnic and gender diversity) enjoy incrementally higher earnings quality than other firms. However, I fail to find support that racial/ethnic and gender intersectionality is associated with improved earnings quality. Lastly, based on critical mass theory, I test whether an industry descriptive norm is necessary for firms to enjoy increased earnings quality. I find that racial/ethnic directors have a meaningful impact on a firm's earnings quality regardless of the level of diversity; even firms with lower than the industry descriptive norm of racial/ethnic diversity enjoy improved earnings quality.