Model
Digital Document
Publisher
Florida Atlantic University
Description
Loggerhead and leatherback sea turtles are often caught as longline bycatch in fisheries
worldwide. These species of sea turtle differ greatly in life history, morphology, and the ways
they are hooked. Leatherbacks tend to be “foul hooked,” externally in the shoulder or flippers,
while loggerheads tend to be hooked in the mouth or they swallow the bait so that hooking is
internal esophagus or stomach. The numbers of loggerheads and leatherbacks caught decreased
after changes in gear, bait and time of sets. However the proportion of leatherback mouth
hookings increased while foul hooking decreased. We described and compared prey approach
and attack behavior of both species in the presence and absence of visual targets. Waterborne
squid and jellyfish odors were used to elicit feeding behavior in the two species. Visual targets
were necessary to elicit biting. Loggerheads approach their prey with the mouth wide open, have
exceptionally good aim and usually bite their intended target. This accuracy is consistent with
the mouth and internal hooking. Leatherbacks frequently overshoot, miss their intended target
then have to re-approach the target multiple times before making contact. Leatherback feeding
behavior is disrupted easily if the body or flippers are touched during prey approach. This reapproach
behavior may make leatherbacks more prone snagging on lines rigged with J-hooks.
The shift by some fisheries to circle hooks, which are less prone to snagging, by give the
leatherbacks multiple chances to attack the bait and ingest it without getting hooked externally.
worldwide. These species of sea turtle differ greatly in life history, morphology, and the ways
they are hooked. Leatherbacks tend to be “foul hooked,” externally in the shoulder or flippers,
while loggerheads tend to be hooked in the mouth or they swallow the bait so that hooking is
internal esophagus or stomach. The numbers of loggerheads and leatherbacks caught decreased
after changes in gear, bait and time of sets. However the proportion of leatherback mouth
hookings increased while foul hooking decreased. We described and compared prey approach
and attack behavior of both species in the presence and absence of visual targets. Waterborne
squid and jellyfish odors were used to elicit feeding behavior in the two species. Visual targets
were necessary to elicit biting. Loggerheads approach their prey with the mouth wide open, have
exceptionally good aim and usually bite their intended target. This accuracy is consistent with
the mouth and internal hooking. Leatherbacks frequently overshoot, miss their intended target
then have to re-approach the target multiple times before making contact. Leatherback feeding
behavior is disrupted easily if the body or flippers are touched during prey approach. This reapproach
behavior may make leatherbacks more prone snagging on lines rigged with J-hooks.
The shift by some fisheries to circle hooks, which are less prone to snagging, by give the
leatherbacks multiple chances to attack the bait and ingest it without getting hooked externally.
Member of