Matthew Jarman

To maintain stability yet retain the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances, social systems must strike a balance between the maintenance of a shared
reality and the survival of minority opinion. A computational model is presented that investigates the interplay of two basic, oppositional social processes—
conformity and anticonformity—in promoting the emergence of this balance. Computer simulations employing a cellular automata platform tested hypotheses
concerning the survival of minority opinion and the maintenance of system stability for different proportions of anticonformity. Results revealed that a relatively
small proportion of anticonformists facilitated the survival of a minority opinion held by a larger number of conformists who would otherwise succumb to
pressures for social consensus. Beyond a critical threshold, however, increased proportions of anticonformists undermined social stability. Understanding the
adaptive benefits of balanced oppositional forces has implications for optimal functioning in psychological and social processes in general.